tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1364482294646808855.post2784052270816579909..comments2023-08-07T08:26:42.019-04:00Comments on 18 to 88: Let me explain (one more time)Demond Sandershttp://www.blogger.com/profile/02321360642491061693noreply@blogger.comBlogger1125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1364482294646808855.post-24092108095778332302007-11-22T14:14:00.000-03:002007-11-22T14:14:00.000-03:00Hypocrisy. Last year, they say the Colts can't win...Hypocrisy. Last year, they say the Colts can't win with that defense, because defense wins championships. Now, with Brady having ridiculously stellar receivers, they say this proves he is the best, while commenting on how he won three rings without such great weapons (um, except Branch).<BR/><BR/>They were right before. Defense won championships, and Brady didn't blow the deal, to his credit. <BR/><BR/>Two facts. First, the Patriots defense has clearly been superior to the Colts the past several years, hence the rings. See, we can admit when they were better at something. <BR/><BR/>Second, Peyton is far better a QB than Brady, though Brady is good. At the end of their carreers, the stats will make this obvious. They simply won't admit this.<BR/><BR/>Defense wins championships. Patriots have three, Colts have one so far. Watch out, NFL, here we come.<BR/><BR/>-- ColtsfanawaltAnonymousnoreply@blogger.com